by Robert L. Gisel
At the UN Assembly Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad inferred that "some segments within the U.S. government" should merit investigation for orchestrating the 9/11 attacks. Obama dismisses this as "inexcusable", "offensive" and "hateful", and trafficking in conspiracy theories.
Trafficking in conspiracy theories? Let's get real.
Lively discussion, tolerance of contrary opinions and varying viewpoints, these are the hallmarks of freedom and necessary to a healthy democracy, the kind that formed America in the first place. The kind of democracy that we are supposedly promoting to the world.
Still, in light of the evidence of tampering and cover up concerning the 9/11 incident so logical, to any rational observer, the suggested investigation put before the UN is a contemplation many Americans would agree with. One can expect it to be not well received by someone with something to hide, who has to fear the casting of doubt on an entire time line of fallacious subterfuges with enormous consequences. Ahmadinejad tossed out a challenge which should be of no consequence to someone with nothing to hide.
Who tries to invalidate free speech, pretentiously exhorting it is loony that someone would suggest a truth has been covered up? Yet a whistle blower in the US today, trying to bring to light believed truth about government wrongdoing, is now officially deemed crazy, a "conspiracy theorist" or, worse yet, a "constitutionalist" (defamatorily intended).
And around comes Homeland Security because one has so freely spoken of the unethical politician so devoid of personal integrity.
The truth is the White House tried to push the cover story off on the public and the public didn't buy it. Originally, the present administration acted to distance itself from the Bush cronies that violated what our country stands for and fouled the name of the US on the world scene. Attempting now to continue the lies, carry on the show, maintaining appearances at all cost, will not win Brownie Points for Barack.
I've heard questioning commentary from other peoples around the world, particularly by our Christian allies, why would we tolerate crimes and abuses by our leaders while known facts lay on the table. Is there any good answer to that except that our press is controlled, our government is bought off and the credulity of resident evil is a hard swallow from the main stream. Nevertheless, rejection of the party line is more widespread among reasonable peoples than we are led to believe.
President Obama is, of course, a politician with an eye always on the polls and a hidden agenda from those so mega-rich they are off the records and beyond the radar. Why be shocked at anything he does, especially if he gets re-elected and can really turn the screws, which he will if not thrown out by the populace not willing to go one more round. One only wonders if he will join the ranks in history of despised Presidents along with Bush (who escaped the impeachment submitted) and Nixon (who was impeached). Does he really, really, really think anyone is going to buy Bush's lies just because they come from the incumbents mouth? I'll bet this drops Obama 10 points in the polls of popularity.
One day there will be a day of reckoning and good sense will prevail. A little urgency added to this request might bring results before evil presents us with the demise of the US as we know it, or worse, a new dark ages.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Intelligence or Counter-Intelligence?
by Robert L. Gisel
Evidently slanderous intelligence makes its way into Bob Woodward's new book "Obama Wars":
Evidently slanderous intelligence makes its way into Bob Woodward's new book "Obama Wars":
'It also reports that the U.S. has intelligence showing that manic-depression has been diagnosed in Afghan President Hamid Karzai and that he was on medication.
'In Kabul, Waheed Omar, Karzai's spokesman, said those allegations were untrue.
' "This is a baseless, inflammatory comment that has its roots in a defaming propaganda campaign against President Karzai's personal integrity, leadership and his stances on matters of Afghan national interests," he said Wednesday. "The president is safe and sound. I can confirm that he takes no medication." '
At best it is a contrary fact, if not counter-intelligence. No doubt Karzai knows enough America's dirty secrets regarding the Afghan war that he could be a threat to the US partisan interests if they fail to subjugate him as a dupe ally. Makes one wonder how much he knows of Bush's degenerate 911 domino fall.
From Chinese spy tech comes the "dead agent". A secret agent who tells lies to the enemy is dead if he is found out. Seeding misinformation is stock in trade for the spy business which lives by intrigues, cabals and subterfuges. In the end US crashed the party in Afghanistan in pursuit of Osama bin Laden, who is far from "a sole gunman" in this affair.
But hey, got to protect those poppy fields, the CIA must have it's financial fix. (Not slander as it is known data that CIA traffics drugs. It's only "coincidence" that the largest drug producing poppy crop in the world is in Afghanistan.)
The truth needs a better council.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
The President Writes, I Answer
by Robert L. Gisel
The email would appear to be from the President. The disclaimer from the Democratic Party and the auto-response from Organizing America would indicate it wasn't and that my response will not return to the President. Expected, but too bad.
Still, I "wrote back". My reply is here, the email to me is below. By blogging it I know someone will hear.
Dear Mr President,
Yes, this is a rough scene in the Gulf. One can only hope it doesn't destroy too many livelihoods.
The Valdez spill in Alaska disrupted lives and the ecology for a long time. The compensation from the Alaska spill never even began to compensate the incomes lost by fishermen and others who fully depended on the natural resources. At best Exxon Mobile, BP's minion, paid dimes on the dollar of actual loss and had the total slashed dramatically by Supreme Court appeal.
The Floyd Lesseigne-s and the Terry Vegas-s and the whole communities of such individuals upended around the Gulf Coast are recipients of a gruesome toll of trusting the drilling rigs to uphold their end of the bargain. Of course anyone had a say in the matter of offshore drilling. Still, this oil spill qualifies as a significant betrayal of trust.
Heads should roll thus. This is far too absurd to consider as a simple "accidents happen". "Some spills are to be expected." Fail-safe technology is so abundantly available to the culpable corporations that this big a flap is no less than criminal or at best criminally negligent. Like manslaughter with an automobile there is a who and a why, neither of which we have heard anything of.
I'm sure an investigation with integrity will find all 3 as you mention; laws never enforced or ignored, lack of oversight including possible special favors or financial irregularities, and laws broken by individuals. You can count on it. Usually this kind of thing is smoothed over by a permissive political/economic culture that dares not make anyone specifically accountable. Cuff 'em Dano!
Asking BP to pay is only a lessor part of this; this will simply marginalize the huge profit figures while we attempt to bring the generality "BP" to responsibility. You might as well shout reparations at the namesake sign on their building. A very trustworthy independent investigation must find out who did this and what they did or failed to do having such gross consequences. Only in this way can we hope for no re-occurrences.
"The blowout diverter failed" doesn't explain anything for me. How come? Was it not designed for those depths? Sloppily mounted so it became jammed or iced in the installation? Made in China for peanuts? Recycled from another mothballed rig? Shortcuts? Was the Mud Engineer on drugs? Could we get some answers to the pertinent questions?
No one has a right to commit such massive destruction to the planet's ecology. Their "help" has become majorly harmful to the general welfare. It is good the response is big, albeit rather late in starting big. Containment is one matter; how about reversal of the damage, how is that to be addressed? Resilience sidesteps stifling effect only as long as one can do something about it.
The greatest good is what furthers the highest survival for the greatest number (meaning people, not barrels). A President who did that without fail would worth his weight in gold.
Respectfully,
Robert L. Gisel
RightsFreedomsandRights.blogspot.com
Saturday, June 5, 2010 4:23 PM
Robert L. --
Yesterday, I visited Caminada Bay in Grand Isle, Louisiana -- one of the first places to feel the devastation wrought by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. While I was here, at Camerdelle's Live Bait shop, I met with a group of local residents and small business owners.
Folks like Floyd Lasseigne, a fourth-generation oyster fisherman. This is the time of year when he ordinarily earns a lot of his income. But his oyster bed has likely been destroyed by the spill.
Terry Vegas had a similar story. He quit the 8th grade to become a shrimper with his grandfather. Ever since, he's earned his living during shrimping season -- working long, grueling days so that he could earn enough money to support himself year-round. But today, the waters where he has worked are closed. And every day, as the spill worsens, he loses hope that he will be able to return to the life he built.
Here, this spill has not just damaged livelihoods. It has upended whole communities. And the fury people feel is not just about the money they have lost. It is about the wrenching recognition that this time their lives may never be the same.
These people work hard. They meet their responsibilities. But now because of a manmade catastrophe -- one that is not their fault and beyond their control -- their lives have been thrown into turmoil. It is brutally unfair. And what I told these men and women is that I will stand with the people of the Gulf Coast until they are again made whole.
That is why, from the beginning, we have worked to deploy every tool at our disposal to respond to this crisis. Today, there are more than 20,000 people working around the clock to contain and clean up this spill. I have authorized 17,500 National Guard troops to participate in the response. More than 1,900 vessels are aiding in the containment and cleanup effort. We have convened hundreds of top scientists and engineers from around the world. This is the largest response to an environmental disaster of this kind in the history of our country.
We have also ordered BP to pay economic injury claims, and this week, the federal government sent BP a preliminary bill for $69 million to pay back American taxpayers for some of the costs of the response so far. In addition, after an emergency safety review, we are putting in place aggressive new operating standards for offshore drilling. And I have appointed a bipartisan commission to look into the causes of this spill. If laws are inadequate, they will be changed. If oversight was lacking, it will be strengthened. And if laws were broken, those responsible will be brought to justice.
These are hard times in Louisiana and across the Gulf Coast, an area that has already seen more than its fair share of troubles. The people of this region have met this terrible catastrophe with seemingly boundless strength and character in defense of their way of life. What we owe them is a commitment by our nation to match the resilience they have shown. That is our mission. And it is one we will fulfill.
Thank you,
President Barack Obama
The email would appear to be from the President. The disclaimer from the Democratic Party and the auto-response from Organizing America would indicate it wasn't and that my response will not return to the President. Expected, but too bad.
Still, I "wrote back". My reply is here, the email to me is below. By blogging it I know someone will hear.
Dear Mr President,
Yes, this is a rough scene in the Gulf. One can only hope it doesn't destroy too many livelihoods.
The Valdez spill in Alaska disrupted lives and the ecology for a long time. The compensation from the Alaska spill never even began to compensate the incomes lost by fishermen and others who fully depended on the natural resources. At best Exxon Mobile, BP's minion, paid dimes on the dollar of actual loss and had the total slashed dramatically by Supreme Court appeal.
The Floyd Lesseigne-s and the Terry Vegas-s and the whole communities of such individuals upended around the Gulf Coast are recipients of a gruesome toll of trusting the drilling rigs to uphold their end of the bargain. Of course anyone had a say in the matter of offshore drilling. Still, this oil spill qualifies as a significant betrayal of trust.
Heads should roll thus. This is far too absurd to consider as a simple "accidents happen". "Some spills are to be expected." Fail-safe technology is so abundantly available to the culpable corporations that this big a flap is no less than criminal or at best criminally negligent. Like manslaughter with an automobile there is a who and a why, neither of which we have heard anything of.
I'm sure an investigation with integrity will find all 3 as you mention; laws never enforced or ignored, lack of oversight including possible special favors or financial irregularities, and laws broken by individuals. You can count on it. Usually this kind of thing is smoothed over by a permissive political/economic culture that dares not make anyone specifically accountable. Cuff 'em Dano!
Asking BP to pay is only a lessor part of this; this will simply marginalize the huge profit figures while we attempt to bring the generality "BP" to responsibility. You might as well shout reparations at the namesake sign on their building. A very trustworthy independent investigation must find out who did this and what they did or failed to do having such gross consequences. Only in this way can we hope for no re-occurrences.
"The blowout diverter failed" doesn't explain anything for me. How come? Was it not designed for those depths? Sloppily mounted so it became jammed or iced in the installation? Made in China for peanuts? Recycled from another mothballed rig? Shortcuts? Was the Mud Engineer on drugs? Could we get some answers to the pertinent questions?
No one has a right to commit such massive destruction to the planet's ecology. Their "help" has become majorly harmful to the general welfare. It is good the response is big, albeit rather late in starting big. Containment is one matter; how about reversal of the damage, how is that to be addressed? Resilience sidesteps stifling effect only as long as one can do something about it.
The greatest good is what furthers the highest survival for the greatest number (meaning people, not barrels). A President who did that without fail would worth his weight in gold.
Respectfully,
Robert L. Gisel
RightsFreedomsandRights.blogspot.com
The Gulf Coast
From:
"Barack Obama"
Add sender to Contacts To:
"Robert L. Gisel"
Robert L. --
Yesterday, I visited Caminada Bay in Grand Isle, Louisiana -- one of the first places to feel the devastation wrought by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. While I was here, at Camerdelle's Live Bait shop, I met with a group of local residents and small business owners.
Folks like Floyd Lasseigne, a fourth-generation oyster fisherman. This is the time of year when he ordinarily earns a lot of his income. But his oyster bed has likely been destroyed by the spill.
Terry Vegas had a similar story. He quit the 8th grade to become a shrimper with his grandfather. Ever since, he's earned his living during shrimping season -- working long, grueling days so that he could earn enough money to support himself year-round. But today, the waters where he has worked are closed. And every day, as the spill worsens, he loses hope that he will be able to return to the life he built.
Here, this spill has not just damaged livelihoods. It has upended whole communities. And the fury people feel is not just about the money they have lost. It is about the wrenching recognition that this time their lives may never be the same.
These people work hard. They meet their responsibilities. But now because of a manmade catastrophe -- one that is not their fault and beyond their control -- their lives have been thrown into turmoil. It is brutally unfair. And what I told these men and women is that I will stand with the people of the Gulf Coast until they are again made whole.
That is why, from the beginning, we have worked to deploy every tool at our disposal to respond to this crisis. Today, there are more than 20,000 people working around the clock to contain and clean up this spill. I have authorized 17,500 National Guard troops to participate in the response. More than 1,900 vessels are aiding in the containment and cleanup effort. We have convened hundreds of top scientists and engineers from around the world. This is the largest response to an environmental disaster of this kind in the history of our country.
We have also ordered BP to pay economic injury claims, and this week, the federal government sent BP a preliminary bill for $69 million to pay back American taxpayers for some of the costs of the response so far. In addition, after an emergency safety review, we are putting in place aggressive new operating standards for offshore drilling. And I have appointed a bipartisan commission to look into the causes of this spill. If laws are inadequate, they will be changed. If oversight was lacking, it will be strengthened. And if laws were broken, those responsible will be brought to justice.
These are hard times in Louisiana and across the Gulf Coast, an area that has already seen more than its fair share of troubles. The people of this region have met this terrible catastrophe with seemingly boundless strength and character in defense of their way of life. What we owe them is a commitment by our nation to match the resilience they have shown. That is our mission. And it is one we will fulfill.
Thank you,
President Barack Obama
Paid for by Organizing for America, a project of the Democratic National Committee -- 430 South Capitol Street SE, Washington, D.C. 20003. This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Arizona Immigration View Warned by UN
by Robert L. Gisel
The controversial Arizona State Immigration Law now is now condemned by the UN board of rights who has posted a warning from the United Nations' Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights which "released a scathing statement" scooped by this Yahoo News article.
The US is a member State of the United Nations. What this says is that we are equally part and parcel of Humanity and should support the principles ourselves. Set a good example is more than a good idea for this nation that historically has been the world's foremost symbol of Human Rights.
The US collaborated in the establishment of Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ethnic profiling was expressly prohibited by the UN International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. The UN International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families was also participated by the US.
A blogger ID Brenny makes this comment:
"First off...who gives a flip what the opinion of the UN is? They are in no way responsible for making USA laws and let's never give up our sovereignty and let them. That is one ineffective non-productive organization."
To which I say:
"You should care.
"The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights was proposed by an American First Lady and accepted by the body of the UN. It parallels our Bills of Rights, the best thing to happen in human rights since the Magna Carta.Only now it applies to the world scene. Without it you have free reign of bullies in power, totalitarian thugs, depraved men who torment and enslave people of good will. With it there is a means to reign in the lawless psychos. Unless you WANT to live the life of a horror film.
"We are not alone on this world. We have to live with everyone else. So why so critical of our fellow man? 80% of the people on the planet are persons of good will.
"If we don't support and embue life to the UN we don't care. What goes around comes around."
Mankind is mankind. The sovereignty of nations does not usurp that fact. If the UN is "useless" in uplifting mankind it could be relative to our own lack of support
It is time to get real and address the basic issue of why millions are sneaking across the US/Mexico border into US border states. What problem are they trying to solve?
The controversial Arizona State Immigration Law now is now condemned by the UN board of rights who has posted a warning from the United Nations' Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights which "released a scathing statement" scooped by this Yahoo News article.
The US is a member State of the United Nations. What this says is that we are equally part and parcel of Humanity and should support the principles ourselves. Set a good example is more than a good idea for this nation that historically has been the world's foremost symbol of Human Rights.
The US collaborated in the establishment of Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ethnic profiling was expressly prohibited by the UN International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. The UN International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families was also participated by the US.
A blogger ID Brenny makes this comment:
"First off...who gives a flip what the opinion of the UN is? They are in no way responsible for making USA laws and let's never give up our sovereignty and let them. That is one ineffective non-productive organization."
To which I say:
"You should care.
"The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights was proposed by an American First Lady and accepted by the body of the UN. It parallels our Bills of Rights, the best thing to happen in human rights since the Magna Carta.Only now it applies to the world scene. Without it you have free reign of bullies in power, totalitarian thugs, depraved men who torment and enslave people of good will. With it there is a means to reign in the lawless psychos. Unless you WANT to live the life of a horror film.
"We are not alone on this world. We have to live with everyone else. So why so critical of our fellow man? 80% of the people on the planet are persons of good will.
"If we don't support and embue life to the UN we don't care. What goes around comes around."
Mankind is mankind. The sovereignty of nations does not usurp that fact. If the UN is "useless" in uplifting mankind it could be relative to our own lack of support
It is time to get real and address the basic issue of why millions are sneaking across the US/Mexico border into US border states. What problem are they trying to solve?
Friday, May 7, 2010
Another Intelligence Subterfuge?
by Robert L. Gisel
Cabal and and deception, intrigues upon intrigues upon intrigues. These make for a good Hollywood action movie, but in real life these are deliberate provocations of honest people of good will. The later forms by far the greatest number and it's for them the protections of the Bill of Rights is intended.
Hollywood aside, a string of apparently live events have occurred and it's time to connect the dots.
First off, a disclaimer: media from the press to junk tabloids are all too often peppered with manufactured stories. A statue on Mars of Elvis Presley emitting the music "Don't Step on My Blue Suede Shoes" was "found by the Mars Explorer" according to one gossip rag. Sometimes they get quite imaginative. You have to be alert for misinformation or even complete baldfaced lies.
On the other hand are whole events that delude. Current events can be falsely PRed, featured in series, singled out as "talking points", etc. This can present a very wrong subliminal or delusional message.
Intelligence agencies likewise are very creative in staging illusions within illusions. In the way that one perceives the subtext in a film as it plays out one can also read the subtexts of political manipulations of a society, if you know what to look for. It is an interesting hobby of mine to read the subliminal messages to pull back the string on who is doing what in their misguided belief of invisibility or brazen pretense of invincibility.
Intelligence agencies run their operations, presumably against the enemy. A sick aspect of our own US agencies is that they will sometimes run an operation against our own in order to popularize some shocking political moves. Jonestown was one of these, an elaborate CIA operation against a not-so-usual religious group.
The Jonestown story makeover turned a possibly fine religious group (some of those interviewed seemed normal and rational people) wanting seclusion from malevelant interventions over into an illusion of kooky religious cult. The political message? Stay away from new era religious movements, other religions are bad.
The full text reveals a CIA operation with CIA gunmen in the jungle shooting down anyone who tried to flee having survived past the hidden poison in their drinks. And Jone's body was never found. Sounds like an intense Hollywood action flick, except it was a very real CIA operation. Now that's intense.
The "press" at the time, before the truth came out about Jonestown, basically sent warning against participating in so-called cult activities, or religious freedoms.
When another fatal government fiasco was unleashed in Waco, Texas, the inept handling of which was just too hoaky. The picture painted was of the Davidians as a kooky cult. Afterwards survivors interviewed seemed to be grounded mainstream Americans. Religious Freedom and the Bill of Rights majorly went by the boards and would seem to answer, what for?
In the wake of the incident fact checking revealed supposed reasons why lacked substance; a lot of undocumented rumor and prejudicial discrimination. It was empty support for a full-on police-siege, military onslaught against over a hundred citizens in a religious retreat.
The question to ask is, what prompted the pre-planning of such an operation in the first place?
The media message, it would seem, was that if you are a religious group not of the good ol' boys then you will die. That's sick.
Acts like this don't just happen. They are caused. Someone is doing it.
Incitement to riot, for instance, doesn't originate with common folk, even those with dissentious grievances born of social injustices. It has been found to be the act of agents provocateurs. Evidence the violent apartheid riots in South Africa.
Where any violence erupts you will find someone secretly behind it with selective lies to both sides. When you have certainty of this little known fact the picture emerges quite differently. Riots are more often deliberated by agents provocateurs who have something to gain politically.
Look at some lies behind the "Islamic radicals". The enturbulated scene would appear to justify $billions support for 2 preempted wars, sweeping laws that encroach on Human Rights and misdirects attention from the real perpetrators of the fatal actions of September 11, 2001. So it is important to view the truth.
Only bullies and thugs, by far a minor minority, go far out of their way to get into fights.
Obscure lines in the Koran are being used to incite a minority Muslim faction to violent religious fanaticism. This is not the view held by the mainstream majority Muslims. Therefore those lines by themselves are not enough. It takes someones cabal covertly directed so as to stir up warring dissension. It can easily be assumed some agents provocateurs stir up the fringe group and provoke them into antagonistically violent activities.
Osama Bin Laden, before he became the much sought target for the World Trade Towers destruction, was a CIA cooperative. This, when it served him to get the USSR out of his backyard. No doubt his actual impetus in the incident is as laden with subterfuge as the Party Line re 911 forwarded to US citizens through the press and the mouths of the Bush cabal.
Since 911, the US conspirators of the controlled demolitions have branded the whisleblowers as "conspiracy theorists" selected for unconstitutional recriminations under the Homeland Security Act. It was flaunted as a game among the Bush Administration how much they could get away with, how much the people would put up with. Their gall has not gone unnoticed.
Subtext oozes from covert operations. It is laughable how easily the truth so arduously hidden can be discovered.
The Taliban claimed responsibility for the Times Square attempt, now say it wasn't them but they applaud the act nevertheless. Someone trained the amateur bomber on explosives in Pakistan. It was very poor training, or designed-to-fail training, as he muffed the bombing. He is simply an incompetent would-be bomber or it was intended he fail.
It appears on cursory examination some other group than the Taliban and Al' Quaida was manipulating the activity. First suspect should the Pakistani group "Deccan Mujahideen" that claimed responsibility for the Mumbai attacks in 2008. They are genus the Pakistani radical group Lashkar-e-Taiba.
The organized attacks in Mumbai were too professionally executed to be a cell terrorist group. Indications are this was a group made-to-order for a counter-intelligence operation against one's own to create alarm for political advantage.
The Lashkar-e-Taiba was formed by Pakistani government, something they fervently deny, to run covert operations against unwanted Indian citizens resident in Pakistan. They later disbanded the group. It reincarnated as a new group, the Deccan Mujahideen, for the operation in Mumbai.
This has similarities to the kidnapping and beheading of Reporter Daniel Pearl by the “The National Movement for the Restoration of Pakistani Sovereignty", first heard of with this incident. US intelligence agencies suspect this group as tied to, guess who. The Pakistan Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence. It could assumed this was another reincarnation of the Lashkar-e-Taiba. It is all too convenient.
Usually you will find me very tolerant of peoples, quite willing to grant beingness and give little consideration to their faults. When it comes to comes to actions by degraded military, intelligence and deceiving governmental activities my security red flags light up like a Christmas tree. Says there's a rat in the woodpile.
Very possibly some better investigative reporters than me will verify the suspicion of covert operations. My intent here is to give a head's up that all may not be not as meets the eye and invite further search into the subject.
MY BLOGS:
WhoWouldWrite.blogspot.com
OnceAnAlaskan.blogspot.com
FavoringLife.blogspot.com
ThinkTankMan.blogspot.com
LimitlessEnergy.blogspot.com
RightsFreedomsandRights.blogspot.com
DesignerGeodesics.blogspot.com
Cabal and and deception, intrigues upon intrigues upon intrigues. These make for a good Hollywood action movie, but in real life these are deliberate provocations of honest people of good will. The later forms by far the greatest number and it's for them the protections of the Bill of Rights is intended.
Hollywood aside, a string of apparently live events have occurred and it's time to connect the dots.
First off, a disclaimer: media from the press to junk tabloids are all too often peppered with manufactured stories. A statue on Mars of Elvis Presley emitting the music "Don't Step on My Blue Suede Shoes" was "found by the Mars Explorer" according to one gossip rag. Sometimes they get quite imaginative. You have to be alert for misinformation or even complete baldfaced lies.
On the other hand are whole events that delude. Current events can be falsely PRed, featured in series, singled out as "talking points", etc. This can present a very wrong subliminal or delusional message.
Intelligence agencies likewise are very creative in staging illusions within illusions. In the way that one perceives the subtext in a film as it plays out one can also read the subtexts of political manipulations of a society, if you know what to look for. It is an interesting hobby of mine to read the subliminal messages to pull back the string on who is doing what in their misguided belief of invisibility or brazen pretense of invincibility.
Intelligence agencies run their operations, presumably against the enemy. A sick aspect of our own US agencies is that they will sometimes run an operation against our own in order to popularize some shocking political moves. Jonestown was one of these, an elaborate CIA operation against a not-so-usual religious group.
The Jonestown story makeover turned a possibly fine religious group (some of those interviewed seemed normal and rational people) wanting seclusion from malevelant interventions over into an illusion of kooky religious cult. The political message? Stay away from new era religious movements, other religions are bad.
The full text reveals a CIA operation with CIA gunmen in the jungle shooting down anyone who tried to flee having survived past the hidden poison in their drinks. And Jone's body was never found. Sounds like an intense Hollywood action flick, except it was a very real CIA operation. Now that's intense.
The "press" at the time, before the truth came out about Jonestown, basically sent warning against participating in so-called cult activities, or religious freedoms.
When another fatal government fiasco was unleashed in Waco, Texas, the inept handling of which was just too hoaky. The picture painted was of the Davidians as a kooky cult. Afterwards survivors interviewed seemed to be grounded mainstream Americans. Religious Freedom and the Bill of Rights majorly went by the boards and would seem to answer, what for?
In the wake of the incident fact checking revealed supposed reasons why lacked substance; a lot of undocumented rumor and prejudicial discrimination. It was empty support for a full-on police-siege, military onslaught against over a hundred citizens in a religious retreat.
The question to ask is, what prompted the pre-planning of such an operation in the first place?
The media message, it would seem, was that if you are a religious group not of the good ol' boys then you will die. That's sick.
Acts like this don't just happen. They are caused. Someone is doing it.
Incitement to riot, for instance, doesn't originate with common folk, even those with dissentious grievances born of social injustices. It has been found to be the act of agents provocateurs. Evidence the violent apartheid riots in South Africa.
Where any violence erupts you will find someone secretly behind it with selective lies to both sides. When you have certainty of this little known fact the picture emerges quite differently. Riots are more often deliberated by agents provocateurs who have something to gain politically.
Look at some lies behind the "Islamic radicals". The enturbulated scene would appear to justify $billions support for 2 preempted wars, sweeping laws that encroach on Human Rights and misdirects attention from the real perpetrators of the fatal actions of September 11, 2001. So it is important to view the truth.
Only bullies and thugs, by far a minor minority, go far out of their way to get into fights.
Obscure lines in the Koran are being used to incite a minority Muslim faction to violent religious fanaticism. This is not the view held by the mainstream majority Muslims. Therefore those lines by themselves are not enough. It takes someones cabal covertly directed so as to stir up warring dissension. It can easily be assumed some agents provocateurs stir up the fringe group and provoke them into antagonistically violent activities.
Osama Bin Laden, before he became the much sought target for the World Trade Towers destruction, was a CIA cooperative. This, when it served him to get the USSR out of his backyard. No doubt his actual impetus in the incident is as laden with subterfuge as the Party Line re 911 forwarded to US citizens through the press and the mouths of the Bush cabal.
Since 911, the US conspirators of the controlled demolitions have branded the whisleblowers as "conspiracy theorists" selected for unconstitutional recriminations under the Homeland Security Act. It was flaunted as a game among the Bush Administration how much they could get away with, how much the people would put up with. Their gall has not gone unnoticed.
Subtext oozes from covert operations. It is laughable how easily the truth so arduously hidden can be discovered.
The Taliban claimed responsibility for the Times Square attempt, now say it wasn't them but they applaud the act nevertheless. Someone trained the amateur bomber on explosives in Pakistan. It was very poor training, or designed-to-fail training, as he muffed the bombing. He is simply an incompetent would-be bomber or it was intended he fail.
It appears on cursory examination some other group than the Taliban and Al' Quaida was manipulating the activity. First suspect should the Pakistani group "Deccan Mujahideen" that claimed responsibility for the Mumbai attacks in 2008. They are genus the Pakistani radical group Lashkar-e-Taiba.
The organized attacks in Mumbai were too professionally executed to be a cell terrorist group. Indications are this was a group made-to-order for a counter-intelligence operation against one's own to create alarm for political advantage.
The Lashkar-e-Taiba was formed by Pakistani government, something they fervently deny, to run covert operations against unwanted Indian citizens resident in Pakistan. They later disbanded the group. It reincarnated as a new group, the Deccan Mujahideen, for the operation in Mumbai.
This has similarities to the kidnapping and beheading of Reporter Daniel Pearl by the “The National Movement for the Restoration of Pakistani Sovereignty", first heard of with this incident. US intelligence agencies suspect this group as tied to, guess who. The Pakistan Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence. It could assumed this was another reincarnation of the Lashkar-e-Taiba. It is all too convenient.
Usually you will find me very tolerant of peoples, quite willing to grant beingness and give little consideration to their faults. When it comes to comes to actions by degraded military, intelligence and deceiving governmental activities my security red flags light up like a Christmas tree. Says there's a rat in the woodpile.
Very possibly some better investigative reporters than me will verify the suspicion of covert operations. My intent here is to give a head's up that all may not be not as meets the eye and invite further search into the subject.
MY BLOGS:
WhoWouldWrite.blogspot.com
OnceAnAlaskan.blogspot.com
FavoringLife.blogspot.com
ThinkTankMan.blogspot.com
LimitlessEnergy.blogspot.com
RightsFreedomsandRights.blogspot.com
DesignerGeodesics.blogspot.com
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
A Fair Warning
by Robert L Gisel
This news alert has just come in about a new Senate Bill perked up my ears but looking into it I don't quite see it as alarming as it might seem on the outside:
S.3081 -- Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention and Prosecution Act of 2010 would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activity. Our friend Ernest Hancock digs into this bill on his Web site.
Secondly, We the People are not "our enemies", as some Congressmen have perhaps been overheard to say. If this is indeed prompted by the Hutaree incident as evidence of a need to suspend the Bill of Rights for domestic military action thus one must draw the line. The CIA has been prohibited by the Courts from intelligence action against citizens within the US and equally the Military should not be allowed to go there.
The Bill cites Article 5 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. This is a thin argument in our current times by reason of two undeclared wars pushed off on us by lies of an Administration, even while incriminated in events used to justify the acts. Murky waters there. Still, with much evidence from lawsuits filed, documentaries and investigative reporting, as well as House Resolution Bills advocating impeachment, these "wars" don't stand up to the acid test.
The purpose of the initial 48 hour interrogation is the determination of "high-value detainee", a military-intelligence euphemism for someone appropriate for covert and Carte Blanche chemical/physical interrogation. The determination of the skill craft used in would include "as the President sees appropriate".
Per wording of the Bill determination of the status of "high value detainee" must be made within 48 hours, of military interrogation of the "unprivileged belligerent", military methods.
If enacted as proposed some citizens could be targeted (deemed "Protester", "Constitutionalists", "Conspiracy Theorists", ie, persons seeking the truth) and seized in the Continental US, held incommunicado indefinitely and with no representation if capriciously determined to be a "high-value detainee". This is how evil politicians have in the past gotten rid of political enemies from among their People, acting in fearful accusation of dissention, where protest and free speech rights get trammeled.
I wouldn't put it beyond possibility that that sub-group of the Hutaree arrested were subjected to infiltration and covertly incited to crazy action, shades of MK Ultra, or agents provocateur (from our side or our enemies). This to rile Congress, to push through innocuous Bills, to quash our freedoms, or just for general turmoil. It has happened before. But people don't just willfully set out to shoot policemen. Exceptions are behavioral modification and psych-drug destructive side effects, but then these aren't "willful".
Actual proof the Hutaree conspired to shoot police officers might be hard to defend in court as it resulted in no shot policemen. The planning of the gangs of thugs like Al Capone, Bonnie and Clyde, and John Dillinger were clearly evident as they did rob banks and shot up the place. One should suspect this as a showcase or Abscam-type set up to launch the Bill, but these are not necessarily connected and may only be tied by human emotion and reaction.
It will take more research, looking into the Geneva Convention itself to determine what is a "privileged belligerent" as opposed to an "unprivileged" one, and whether either of these even apply to climate now in the shadow of Bush's "wars". Either way it is a cop-out: without court sustainable evidence one can still interrogate the hell out them and get the dope under military-intelligence drugs and torturous duress not hindered by "privileged" restrictions.
This becomes a Bill to watch as to what tag-ons may go with it or onerous wording changes might arise.
MY BLOGS:
WhoWouldWrite.blogspot.com
OnceAnAlaskan.blogspot.com
FavoringLife.blogspot.com
ThinkTankMan.blogspot.com
LimitlessEnergy.blogspot.com
RightsFreedomsandRights.blogspot.com
DesignerGeodesics.blogspot.com
This news alert has just come in about a new Senate Bill perked up my ears but looking into it I don't quite see it as alarming as it might seem on the outside:
S.3081 -- Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention and Prosecution Act of 2010 would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activity. Our friend Ernest Hancock digs into this bill on his Web site.
Since the Hutaree ring got rounded up in Michigan a week and a half ago, we’ve seen more than one congressperson mouthing off about “our enemies.” They aren’t just Islamic extremists anymore; we must be wary of the “homegrown terrorists” now.
The proposed activation of the military against private citizens in circumvention the Bill of Rights appears to be an ominous tryst down the path of suppression of Freedom. There is no domestic use for military here.
Secondly, We the People are not "our enemies", as some Congressmen have perhaps been overheard to say. If this is indeed prompted by the Hutaree incident as evidence of a need to suspend the Bill of Rights for domestic military action thus one must draw the line. The CIA has been prohibited by the Courts from intelligence action against citizens within the US and equally the Military should not be allowed to go there.
The Bill cites Article 5 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. This is a thin argument in our current times by reason of two undeclared wars pushed off on us by lies of an Administration, even while incriminated in events used to justify the acts. Murky waters there. Still, with much evidence from lawsuits filed, documentaries and investigative reporting, as well as House Resolution Bills advocating impeachment, these "wars" don't stand up to the acid test.
The purpose of the initial 48 hour interrogation is the determination of "high-value detainee", a military-intelligence euphemism for someone appropriate for covert and Carte Blanche chemical/physical interrogation. The determination of the skill craft used in would include "as the President sees appropriate".
Per wording of the Bill determination of the status of "high value detainee" must be made within 48 hours, of military interrogation of the "unprivileged belligerent", military methods.
If enacted as proposed some citizens could be targeted (deemed "Protester", "Constitutionalists", "Conspiracy Theorists", ie, persons seeking the truth) and seized in the Continental US, held incommunicado indefinitely and with no representation if capriciously determined to be a "high-value detainee". This is how evil politicians have in the past gotten rid of political enemies from among their People, acting in fearful accusation of dissention, where protest and free speech rights get trammeled.
I wouldn't put it beyond possibility that that sub-group of the Hutaree arrested were subjected to infiltration and covertly incited to crazy action, shades of MK Ultra, or agents provocateur (from our side or our enemies). This to rile Congress, to push through innocuous Bills, to quash our freedoms, or just for general turmoil. It has happened before. But people don't just willfully set out to shoot policemen. Exceptions are behavioral modification and psych-drug destructive side effects, but then these aren't "willful".
Actual proof the Hutaree conspired to shoot police officers might be hard to defend in court as it resulted in no shot policemen. The planning of the gangs of thugs like Al Capone, Bonnie and Clyde, and John Dillinger were clearly evident as they did rob banks and shot up the place. One should suspect this as a showcase or Abscam-type set up to launch the Bill, but these are not necessarily connected and may only be tied by human emotion and reaction.
It will take more research, looking into the Geneva Convention itself to determine what is a "privileged belligerent" as opposed to an "unprivileged" one, and whether either of these even apply to climate now in the shadow of Bush's "wars". Either way it is a cop-out: without court sustainable evidence one can still interrogate the hell out them and get the dope under military-intelligence drugs and torturous duress not hindered by "privileged" restrictions.
This becomes a Bill to watch as to what tag-ons may go with it or onerous wording changes might arise.
MY BLOGS:
WhoWouldWrite.blogspot.com
OnceAnAlaskan.blogspot.com
FavoringLife.blogspot.com
ThinkTankMan.blogspot.com
LimitlessEnergy.blogspot.com
RightsFreedomsandRights.blogspot.com
DesignerGeodesics.blogspot.com
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Lawsuits Fly Over Legality of Health Care Bill
by Robert L. Gisel
The controversy over the legality and fundamental rightness of the Heath Care Bill does not not end with its signing by the President. In fact the opposition only mounts as a mound of lawsuits appear to contest it.
Such as this headline:
ON CAPITOL HILL
Posted: December 21, 2009
8:37 pm Eastern
Revolt by the sovereign states of the Union
As I write this, Virginia is set to file a lawsuit as soon as the usurper in the White House signs these junk bills into "law." The criminal syndicate in Comrade Obama's Politburo and Department of Justice will scoff at the notion that this "law" violates many Amendments: Fifth, Ninth, Tenth. They will try to use their favorite stand by - the commerce clause:
The Health Care precedent in Massachusetts Obamacare is modeled after was a financial disaster:
Lawsuits like this cost serious money, but the cost of not defeating this junk about to become "law" will be a massive financial disaster. Massachusetts Treasurer Says Obamacare Will Bankrupt Country in 4 Years. This is Mitt Romney Care, the plastic phony positioning himself for another presidential run in 2012. A yes vote by the newly minted fake conservative senator, Scott Brown, helped get it passed. Romney Care has had a devastating impact on Massachusetts:
From a sceptical eye it would seem that the main financial impact of the Bill won't come until after 2014, as that is when most of the Bill is in effect. So Obama will be able to say what a good boy am I for reelection and then will start in earnest to bankrupt the country in his second term, much in the way Bush's second term found the 911 scenario upon us fomenting Human Rights violations of the Homeland Security Bill and two preemptive undeclared wars. One wonders what else he has in mind for us.
Myself, I'm looking for a class action suit I can join in on. Anybody game?
The controversy over the legality and fundamental rightness of the Heath Care Bill does not not end with its signing by the President. In fact the opposition only mounts as a mound of lawsuits appear to contest it.
Such as this headline:
ON CAPITOL HILL
Obama sued for secret abortion meetings
'In haste to socialize medicine, president violated commitment to transparency'
Posted: December 21, 2009
8:37 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
A legal firebrand whose work fighting corruption left both Bill Clinton and Dick Cheney on the defensive today took on Barack Obama, suing the president for secret meetings with Planned Parenthood and other lobbyists on his plans to nationalize health care.
 Larry Klayman |
Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and, more recently, Freedom Watch USA, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The law requires disclosure of records of meetings between the executive branch and outside industry lobbyists. It also requires access to meetings.
And another one:Revolt by the sovereign states of the Union
As I write this, Virginia is set to file a lawsuit as soon as the usurper in the White House signs these junk bills into "law." The criminal syndicate in Comrade Obama's Politburo and Department of Justice will scoff at the notion that this "law" violates many Amendments: Fifth, Ninth, Tenth. They will try to use their favorite stand by - the commerce clause:
NEW YORK, March 22 (Reuters) - "Virginia's attorney general said he plans to sue the federal government over the healthcare reform legislation, saying Congress lacks authority to force people to buy health insurance."
Other States file suit as well:
BOISE, Idaho — "Idaho took the lead in a growing, nationwide fight against health care overhaul Wednesday when its governor became the first to sign a measure requiring the state attorney general to sue the federal government if residents are forced to buy health insurance."
Florida says several states to file health care lawsuit
MIAMI, March 22 (Reuters) - "Florida's attorney general will file a lawsuit with nine other state attorneys general opposing the health care legislation passed by Congress, a spokeswoman said on Monday.
"The health care reform legislation passed by the U.S. House of Representatives last night clearly violates the U.S. Constitution and infringes on each state's sovereignty," Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, a Republican, said in a prepared statement announcing a news conference
The Health Care precedent in Massachusetts Obamacare is modeled after was a financial disaster:
Lawsuits like this cost serious money, but the cost of not defeating this junk about to become "law" will be a massive financial disaster. Massachusetts Treasurer Says Obamacare Will Bankrupt Country in 4 Years. This is Mitt Romney Care, the plastic phony positioning himself for another presidential run in 2012. A yes vote by the newly minted fake conservative senator, Scott Brown, helped get it passed. Romney Care has had a devastating impact on Massachusetts:
I watched Cahill on FOX the other night explain in detail how disastrous the Romney Care system has been for Massachusetts and then he outlined for ObamaCare. Very articulate and had the numbers to back up his statements. Like I said, the lawsuits will come cheap in the long run."The Massachusetts treasurer said Tuesday that Congress will “threaten to wipe out the American economy within four years” if it adopts a health-care overhaul modeled after the Bay State's. Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill – a former Democrat running as an independent for governor – said the local plan enacted in 2006 has succeeded only because of huge subsidies and favorable regulatory changes from the federal government. “Who, exactly, is going to bail out the federal government if this plan goes national?” he asked."
From a sceptical eye it would seem that the main financial impact of the Bill won't come until after 2014, as that is when most of the Bill is in effect. So Obama will be able to say what a good boy am I for reelection and then will start in earnest to bankrupt the country in his second term, much in the way Bush's second term found the 911 scenario upon us fomenting Human Rights violations of the Homeland Security Bill and two preemptive undeclared wars. One wonders what else he has in mind for us.
Myself, I'm looking for a class action suit I can join in on. Anybody game?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
